A (IN) CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DO INTERROGATÓRIO DO ACUSADO POR MEIO DA VIDEOCONFERÊNCIA

Abstract

This paper describes the (un) constitutionality of the interrogation of the accused through video conferencing. Such an approach is necessary because with the technological advent, brought dynamism and agility, and increasingly leads to the change in the routine of society, and also the way she handles the affairs of their daily life, and the law, is no different, it ends up being heavily influenced by this technological development, either in the production of evidence or performance of procedural acts, and video conferencing is a technological resource that, through simultaneous transmission of audio and image, allows communication in real time, between people who are in different locations thus facilitating the judiciary. The purpose of this study is aimed to question the (un) constitutionality of the interrogation of the accused through video conferencing, performing a deepening of the use of videoconferencing in the Brazilian Criminal Procedure, according to the 11,900 law that entered into force on 09 January 2009. In addition, show the concepts and the different opinions of scholars on the subject. This purpose is achieved by intense literature review in books, journals, articles, research sites. The study will be divided into six parts, namely: raising the theoretical framework; the theoretical material selection appropriate to this research; critical reading - the analytical set reference; organization of the data collected and preparing the final report. Research has shown that the questioning by videoconference is a valuable tool for the judiciary as well as being more economical, it helps the system flow thus avoiding delay in proceedings, and also security for society. also demonstrated that the questioning by videoconference is valid only when it does not hurt the Law 11,900 / 09.